Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 180
Filtrar
3.
Clin Liver Dis ; 23(1): 25-38, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30454830

RESUMEN

In the intersection of alcohol ingestion with the law, medical ethics, and public safety, physicians are often unsure about how to proceed. Physicians' primary focus should be on patient education with an ethical and legal duty to warn the patient of the adverse effects of alcohol. Warning third parties of potential harm related to alcohol-related impairment may involve a breach of patient confidentiality; therefore it should only be undertaken after careful analysis suggests that the risk for significant harm exceeds the burden that results to the patient from warning others. The law remains vague in this area.


Asunto(s)
Intoxicación Alcohólica , Alcoholismo/rehabilitación , Confidencialidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Deber de Advertencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inhabilitación Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Encefalopatía Hepática/metabolismo , Encefalopatía Hepática/fisiopatología , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/metabolismo , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Seguridad , Autoinforme
5.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(6): 704-710, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28807661

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify which states currently have substance use disorder (SUD) programs to facilitate the return of pharmacy professionals (including technicians, interns, and student pharmacists) to active practice, to identify the operational structures used by the states in providing these services and compare them with those reported previously, and to compile the most current and accurate contact information for each state SUD program. METHODS: Information specific to each state program was identified from Internet resources including state pharmacy associations, licensing boards, and professional associations. Each state's site was evaluated for currency within 2016-2017. Direct contact by e-mail or telephone using the program information, or association, or licensing board contacts was pursued to identify the current program status. RESULTS: Five states with no program in 1990 have since developed programs, and 2 states with programs in 1990 have closed their programs. Overall, 4 states do not currently have a program, 2 of which have never had one. One of the 2 states has recent authorization from their legislature to develop a program. Three other programs are currently in transition from 1 model to another, resulting in website inaccuracies. The operational models have undergone significant shifts with a decrease in the association (± [with or without] Foundation) model toward a group health care association or organization model including other health- or all state-licensed professionals. CONCLUSION: Currently, 46 states have programs for assisting pharmacy professionals. Information presented in this article provides the most current contact information and model structure used by states with programs. Frequent updating of program information is critical for those who might decide to seek assistance. Expansion to include a central database that enables rigorous evaluation of outcomes and specific features is viewed as desirable.


Asunto(s)
Farmacéuticos , Técnicos de Farmacia , Inhabilitación Profesional , Planes Estatales de Salud , Estudiantes de Farmacia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Regulación Gubernamental , Humanos , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Técnicos de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Formulación de Políticas , Inhabilitación Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Desarrollo de Programa , Gobierno Estatal , Planes Estatales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estudiantes de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Arch. prev. riesgos labor. (Ed. impr.) ; 19(1): 15-21, ene.-mar. 2016. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-148796

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Describir la incidencia y evolución de la incapacidad temporal (IT) por contingencias comunes y profesionales en la población trabajadora de los centros sanitarios de Cataluña. Métodos: La población de estudio estuvo constituida por los 25.964 trabajadores de 30 centros sanitarios de Cataluña, durante el período 2009-2012. La información sobre los episodios de IT se obtuvo de los registros de las Direcciones de Recursos Humanos. Se definieron unos indicadores de IT, y se calcularon las tasas de incidencia de IT y la evolución temporal, según la duración y tipo de episodio, y el tamaño y actividad de los centros sanitarios. Resultados: La evolución temporal de las tasas de incidencia de IT por contingencia común mostró una tendencia a la disminución en el período 2009-2012. Los centros de pequeño tamaño tuvieron tasa de IT por contingencia común inferior que los de mayor tamaño (p<0,001). Los centros sociosanitarios son los que presentaron mayores tasas de IT por contingencia común, especialmente la de muy corta duración (p<0,001). . Los centros de atención primaria tuvieron las tasas más bajas de IT por contingencia profesional siendo la más elevada la de los centros sociosanitarios, especialmente la de larga duración (p<0.01). Conclusiones: Las diferencias observadas en las tasas de incidencia de IT según el tipo de actividad del centro sanitario podrían deberse a diferencias en las condiciones de trabajo


Objective: To describe the incidence and evolution of sickness absence (SA) for non-occupational and occupational illness/injury in the population of workers in Catalonian Health Centers based on the definition of a set of common indicators. Methods: The study population consisted of 25,964 workers from 30 health centers in Catalonia, during 2009-2012. Information on SA episodes was obtained from records of the Directorate of Human Resources. SA indicators were defined, and SA incidence rates and temporal evolution were calculated, depending on the length and type of episode, and the size and activity of health centers. Results: SA incidence rates for non-occupational illness and injury showed a decreasing trend during 2009-2012. Smaller centers had lower SA rates for non-occupational conditions than larger centers (p<0,001). . Social health centers had higher SA rates of non-occupational illness and injury, especially those with a very short duration (p<0.001). Primary care centers had the lowest SA occupational illness and injury rates, with the highest rates occurring in the social health centers, especially long-term centers (p<0.01). Conclusions: The differences in incidence rates of SA detected by type of activity of the health centers could be due to differences in working conditions


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Ausencia por Enfermedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inhabilitación Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , 16360 , Absentismo , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/tendencias , Empleos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Empleos en Salud/normas , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Planes de Contingencia , Salud Laboral/normas , Salud Laboral/tendencias , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Nurse Res ; 23(1): 21-5, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26365072

RESUMEN

AIM: To discuss the legal, ethical and practical considerations in UK studies involving nurses with dyslexia and medication administration errors (MAEs). BACKGROUND: Nurses with dyslexia are a vulnerable population as they are susceptible to misrepresentation in research, especially that which involves a sensitive topic such as MAEs. DISCUSSION: Nurses with dyslexia may be particularly vulnerable to research that could exploit, implicate or attribute unsafe practice to them and their disability. Special consideration should be exercised when researching this population. CONCLUSION: Despite the potential for legal, ethical and practical issues, MAEs and nurses with dyslexia are under-researched areas and warrant further research. Benefits can be gained, not only by participants but also those with a vested interest in how best to support dyslexic nurses in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH/PRACTICE: Through effective design, risks can be identified and minimised, and the research made viable, ethically sound and ultimately beneficial to all those involved.


Asunto(s)
Dislexia , Errores de Medicación/enfermería , Investigación en Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería/ética , Personal de Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inhabilitación Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sujetos de Investigación , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Reino Unido
11.
Rev. Asoc. Esp. Espec. Med. Trab ; 24(3): 121-125, sept. 2015.
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-144189

RESUMEN

La estomatología se define como una especialidad médica que se ocupa del tratamiento de enfermedades bucales y adyacentes. Al igual que los odontólogos, estos profesionales están expuestos a diversos riesgos laborales, tales como movimientos repetitivos, posturas forzadas, fatiga física y mental. Caso Clínico: Hombre de 56 años, con antecedentes de hipertensión arterial, tabaquismo, dislipemia, queratosis actínica en cuero cabelludo. Presenta desde el año 2006 de forma reiterada, lesión tendinoflexora en mano derecha, valorados por el servicio de prevención de riesgos laborales, recibe tratamiento rehabilitador con escasa mejoría clínica y múltiples recidivas. En vista de dicha evolución se decide intervención quirúrgica del tendón flexor del 2º dedo de mano derecha con el diagnóstico de Enfermedad de Dupuytren. Posteriormente se propone al Instituto Nacional de Seguridad Social (INSS) una Enfermedad Profesional. por tratarse de un trastorno derivado de la actividad laboral, siendo reconocida en el 2007. Por las múltiples complicaciones a pesar de tratamiento médico y quirúrgico y los días de baja en la empresa, el INSS propone una incapacidad permanente total para la profesión habitual, con respuesta favorable. El análisis del caso, permite estudiar la evolución de patologías en los trabajadores, relacionando el origen de las mismas con su actividad laboral, destacando la conducta a seguir si ese padecimiento fuese demostrado como enfermedad profesional. Así mismo, permite repasar los tipos de incapacidad que pueden generarse a partir de una enfermedad y sus repercusiones en la vida laboral del trabajador (AU)


The stomatology is a medical speciality which consider treatment of mouth diseases and adjacent. As the odontologists, they are exposed to diverse occupational risk, such as repetitive movements, forced positions, physical and mental fatigue. Clinical case: 56 years old Man, with precedents of arterial hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, actinic queratosis in scalp. He continuously presents since 2006, tendon flexor injury in the right hand, valued by the service of prevention of occupational risks, receives treatment with poor clinical improvement and many recurrences. Since the above mentioned evolution, it was decided surgical intervention of the flexor tendon of 2nd finger of right hand with the diagnosis of Dupuytren’s Disease. Later it is proposed to the National Institute of Health Service (INSS) an Occupational Disease, for a disorder derived from the occupational activity, which is admitted in 2007. For the multiple complications in spite of medical and surgical treatment and the days of sick leave in the company, the INSS proposes a permanent total incapacity for the usual profession, with favourable response. The analysis of the case, allows studying the evolution of pathologies in workers, relating the origin of the diseases with the occupational activity, emphasizing the courses of action if this suffering could be demonstrated as occupational disease. It also allows reviewing the different types of disability that can be generated from a disease and its repercussions in the occupational life of the worker (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Contractura de Dupuytren/epidemiología , Contractura de Dupuytren/prevención & control , Medicina Oral , Odontología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Riesgos Laborales , Salud Laboral , Salud Laboral/normas , Inhabilitación Médica , Inhabilitación Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inhabilitación Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
J Nurs Scholarsh ; 47(3): 248-57, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25808726

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this legal case review and analysis was to determine what kinds of cases involving nurses with disabilities are typically brought to attorneys, which cases tend to be successful, and how and when a nurse with a disability should pursue legal action. DESIGN: The review used the standard legal case analysis method to analyze legal cases that have been brought by registered nurses (RNs) with physical or sensory disabilities from 1995 to 2013. The cases span the period following the enactment of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 through the ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) of 2008. METHODS: A nurse attorney reviewed the background material to find every case involving an RN with a disability, excluding those with mental health disabilities or substance abuse issues. Case analysis was conducted using standard legal case analysis procedures. Fifty-six cases were analyzed. FINDINGS: The cases were categorized into five types of legal claims: (a) disability discrimination (84%); (b) failure to accommodate (46%); (c) retaliation (12.5%); (d) association (3.6%); and (e) hostile work environment (7%). The cases were largely unsuccessful, particularly those brought under the ADA instead of the ADAAA. CONCLUSIONS: The case analysis revealed that several cases brought by RNs with disabilities using the ADA might have been successful under the ADAAA. In addition, the case analysis has provided vital information for administrators, leaders, and clinical nurses regarding when a case is appropriate for legal action. These findings from this review will help nurses recognize when they are being treated in a discriminatory way in the workplace, what their legal rights and responsibilities are, and at what point they should pursue legal action. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This review has relevance to all RNs working in clinical and academic settings who may have a congenital or acquired physical or sensory disability.


Asunto(s)
Derechos Civiles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Personas con Discapacidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Empleo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inhabilitación Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Discriminación Social/legislación & jurisprudencia
18.
Br Dent J ; 215(5): 201-2, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24029966
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...